18 results about "Verified procedure" patented technology

The present disclosure describes systems and methods for generating, implementing, and verifying a security program for organizations. In one aspect, a method for generating, implementing, and verifying a security program for an organization is disclosed. The method includes receiving inputs providing information about the organization, generating the security program by processing the inputs describing the information about the organization, the security program including assessment objectives for the security program, and providing the information about the organization and the security program as model inputs to a security management model to generate output including implementation procedures defining steps for implementing the security program and verification procedures defining steps for verifying the assessment objectives of the security program.

Systems and methods are provided for validation and enforcement of the use of factory-provisioned geographic restrictions for the operation of certain hardware components of IHSs (Information Handling Systems). During factory provisioning of the IHS, a factory-signed certificate is uploaded to the IHS that identifies the factory-installed hardware of the IHS and any geographic restrictions on those individual hardware components, such as restrictions that limit the operation of specialized hardware to a particular data center. Upon deployment of the IHS, validation procedures use an inventory from the certificate to validate the detected IHS hardware as factory-installed. The validation procedures use the geographic restriction from the certificate to confirm the detected IHS hardware is configured to operate at the location at which the IHS is operation.

The invention relates to a method for securely equipping systems (Sys) with an individual certificate, for secure communication with at least one communication partner, wherein a certification authority (CA) is established based on an asymmetric key pair (CARootPub, CARootPriv).It is characterized by the fact that at least one verification instance (PI) is established, wherein the verification instance (PI) is equipped with all the necessary means required for verifying certificates (Cert) issued by the certification authority (CA), and which include at least the implementation of a signature verification procedure for signatures created using the private key (CARootPriv) of the certification authority (CA) and the public key (CARootPub) of the certification authority (CA), wherein, for the purpose of carrying out the verification, the certificate (Cert) to be verified is transmitted from a requesting system (Sys) to the verification instance (PI), the verification instance (PI) performs the verification and communicates the result of the verification to the requesting system (Sys) in a suitable manner.

The present disclosure describes systems and methods for generating, implementing, and verifying a security program for organizations. In one aspect, a method for generating, implementing, and verifying a security program for an organization is disclosed. The method includes receiving inputs providing information about the organization, generating the security program by processing the inputs describing the information about the organization, the security program including assessment objectives for the security program, and providing the information about the organization and the security program as model inputs to a security management model to generate output including implementation procedures defining steps for implementing the security program and verification procedures defining steps for verifying the assessment objectives of the security program.

Systems and methods are provided for validating client information prior to certificate issuance. A method, according to one implementation, includes a step of providing an initiation option to a validation agent in response to the validation agent selecting a portion of a document retrieved from a reliable web source, the initiation option allowing the validation agent to initiate an automated validation procedure. In response to the validation agent selecting the initiation option, the method includes a step of performing the automated validation procedure, wherein the automated validation procedure includes a) a comparing sub-step in which the portion of the document selected by the validation agent is compared with client information included in a certificate request, and b) a compliance sub-step in which it is determined whether or not a comparison, based on the comparing sub-step, complies with a validation guideline.

In some implementations, a verification system may receive input from a user associated with an account that already underwent a verification procedure. Accordingly, the verification system may generate at least one graphical user interface associated with a first verification operation, within the verification procedure, that is associated with a failed outcome. The verification system may perform verification of the user based on new input for the first verification operation and old input for one or more additional verification operations within the verification procedure.

Disclosed herein is a medical system (100) for providing station specific instructions (150) for a set of stations (102). The execution of the machine executable instructions (140) causes a computational system (106) to control a subject locator (136) for determining (200) the current station and to perform a verification procedure comprising: receiving (202) station specific instructions comprising at least one manual action in response to inputting a received chosen protocol (144), the indication of the current station and an instruction mode (146) into an instruction engine (148); presenting (204) the station specific instructions; controlling (206) a subject measurement system (132); assessing (208) a measure of completion (152); and modifying (212) the instruction mode if (210) the measure of completion meets a predetermined modification criterion (154). The computational system to repeatedly performs the verification procedure until the measure of completion meets (214) a predetermined completion criterion (156).

A procedure for decentralized validation of an application program (130) is provided. The process includes the following steps: Providing target hardware (110) with an operating system (120) for running the application program; Providing a validation program (130) for validating the application program; installing the validation program (130) under the operating system (120) on the target hardware (110); Starting the validation program (120) on the target hardware (100). The validation program (130) performs a computer-implemented procedure with the following steps: Receiving the application program to be validated; checking the received application program against predefined validation criteria (150) to determine whether the application program meets the security standards and functional requirements of the target hardware (110) and operating system (120); Providing a validation report (160) based on the results of the review of the application program, wherein the validation report includes information on the validity of the application program; Output of the validation report (160); out. Furthermore, the registration concerns a system for the decentralized validation of an application program.

The invention discloses a large-model-assisted automatic program verification method and system, and the method comprises the steps: executing data scale correlation analysis for a to-be-verified program to judge whether data scale optimization can be carried out or not, executing data scale optimization if the data scale optimization can be carried out, and verifying an optimization result by using a verification tool; carrying out defect analysis on the to-be-verified program to judge whether a defect exists or not, and if the defect exists, generating a counter example according to the corresponding defect to verify the counter example; otherwise, a verification tool is used for verification, and in the execution process of the method, data scale optimization and defect analysis are both assisted by a large model for analysis. According to the method, a large model is used for assisting in data scale optimization and defect analysis, calculation resource consumption in the verification process is reduced, the verification time is shortened, the verification accuracy is improved, and particularly the verification efficiency of a complex program is improved.

In some implementations, a verification system may receive input from a user associated with an account that already underwent a verification procedure. Accordingly, the verification system may generate at least one graphical user interface associated with a first verification operation, within the verification procedure, that is associated with a failed outcome. The verification system may perform verification of the user based on new input for the first verification operation and old input for one or more additional verification operations within the verification procedure.

Systems and methods for a zero trust architecture are provided. A method, according to one implementation, includes detecting an initial attempt by an entity to connect, access, or communicate with a network resource and blocking the entity from initially connecting, accessing, or communicating with the network resource. The method also includes performing a verification procedure to verify one or more of an identity of the entity and a context of the initial attempt. The method also performs a control procedure to control one or more of malicious content and sensitive data. In addition, the method includes performing an enforcement procedure in response to results of the verification procedure and control procedure to determine how to handle the initial attempt.

An information handling system may include a physical storage resource with a software component stored thereon. Prior to delivery, the information handling system may be configured to secure access to the software component by: generating a key blob based on seed data; encrypting the software component using the key blob as an encryption key; and storing an encrypted version of the seed data in a certificate. After delivery, the information handling system may be configured to provide access to the software component by: verifying a credential of a user; in response to successful verification, providing the user with access to a validation procedure that is configured to decrypt the seed data from the certificate; re-generating the key blob based on the decrypted seed data; and decrypting the software component using the re-generated key blob as a decryption key.

Methods, systems, and devices for one or more acceleration engines for memory sub-system operations are described. An acceleration engine can perform one or more validation procedures on one or more codewords of a management unit. The acceleration engine can collect validation data for the management unit based on performing the validation procedures. The acceleration engine can aggregate the validation data into group validation data associated with a set of management units. The acceleration engine can transmit the group validation data to firmware of a memory sub-system or a host device.