124 results about "Cost of treatment" patented technology

The present invention relates to a method of producing the sensors for monitoring corrosion of heat exchanger tubes in a thermal power plant. The sensor is made of the tubes taken out from actual heat-exchanger. As a result, the sensor not only has the same material as the actual heat-exchanger tubes, but also has the same surface state where it contacts the working medium. Therefore, a serious technical difficulties have been solved that the sensor made by the prior art can't measure different corrosion states of actual heat-exchanger tubes, that the corrosion rate measured is different from the corrosion rate of actual heat-exchanger tubes, and that the cost of anti-corrosive treatments is high . By use of the sensor made by the present invention, the different corrosion states of actual heat-exchanger tubes can be measured, not only the rate of uniform corrosion of actual heat-exchanger tubes can be measured but also the rate of localized corrosion of the heat-exchanger tubes can be measured. Moreover, the cost of treatment of anti-corrosion can be decreased.

In an exhaust gas treatment system, dust in a high temperature exhaust gas is caught by a high temperature dry electrostatic precipitator, a nitrogen oxide NO2 in the exhaust gas is removed by denitration means, then the exhaust gas is cooled by an air heater, and the exhaust gas is passed through an activated carbon fiber layer of activated carbon treatment means to remove sulfur oxides SO2 and SO3 contained in the exhaust gas. The exhaust gas treatment system reduces the costs of treatment and equipment, and downsizes the system.

The invention disclosed relates to a method and apparatus for the denitrification of groundwater in situ in an aquifer under substantially anaerobic conditions, the method comprising(a) providing a network, including an extraction well for removal of groundwater from the aquifer and a plurality of injection wells for returning groundwater to the aquifer, the injection wells being arranged in a line substantially perpendicular to the direction of groundwater flow, the extraction well being located downstream or upstream of the line of injection wells, and the spacing of the wells and the number of injection wells being determined by the mathematical relationshipwhere J is the cost of treatment, CP and CI are the costs of extraction and injection wells, respectively; n is the number of injection wells, and W is the distance across the protected area, and wherein the water stream is evenly distributed between injection wells, according to the relationship:where F is the water flow rate (e-extraction well, i-injection well) and n is the number of injection wells,(b) removing groundwater from the aquifer by the extraction well,(c) adding a carbon source to the groundwater in a controlled manner,(d) returning the carbon source amended groundwater to the aquifer by the injection wells in even distribution, the water flow rate being controlled, and(e) monitoring the nitrate concentration of the groundwater removed from the extraction well, a decrease in nitrate concentration being indicative of denitrification.